<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What you really need to know about mathematics of A/B split testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/what-you-really-need-to-know-about-mathematics-of-ab-split-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/what-you-really-need-to-know-about-mathematics-of-ab-split-testing/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:32:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: A/B spilttest giver ikke et brugbart resultat</title>
		<link>http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/what-you-really-need-to-know-about-mathematics-of-ab-split-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-4231</link>
		<dc:creator>A/B spilttest giver ikke et brugbart resultat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 12:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/?p=60#comment-4231</guid>
		<description>[...] læsning What you really need to know about mathematics of A/B split testing  Tweet    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.    &#8592; Skal kundens [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] læsning What you really need to know about mathematics of A/B split testing  Tweet    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.    &larr; Skal kundens [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paras Chopra</title>
		<link>http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/what-you-really-need-to-know-about-mathematics-of-ab-split-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-4030</link>
		<dc:creator>Paras Chopra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 12:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/?p=60#comment-4030</guid>
		<description>@Rafael: yes, your understanding is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rafael: yes, your understanding is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael</title>
		<link>http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/what-you-really-need-to-know-about-mathematics-of-ab-split-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-4029</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 12:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/?p=60#comment-4029</guid>
		<description>Hey Paras, thank you for the answer!

So the &quot;chance to beat the control&quot; can be measured just by measuring this overlap?

For instance, does a 10% overlap mean a 90% chance to beat the control?

And a 15% overlap -&gt; 85% chance
20% overlap -&gt; 80% chance

And so on, so forth. Is this the case, or did I misinterpret it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Paras, thank you for the answer!</p>
<p>So the &#8220;chance to beat the control&#8221; can be measured just by measuring this overlap?</p>
<p>For instance, does a 10% overlap mean a 90% chance to beat the control?</p>
<p>And a 15% overlap -&gt; 85% chance<br />
20% overlap -&gt; 80% chance</p>
<p>And so on, so forth. Is this the case, or did I misinterpret it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paras Chopra</title>
		<link>http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/what-you-really-need-to-know-about-mathematics-of-ab-split-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-4026</link>
		<dc:creator>Paras Chopra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 07:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/?p=60#comment-4026</guid>
		<description>@Rafael: it depends on how important results are for an organization and how much risk (of being wrong) it is willing to accept. 99% chance to beat original is always better, but if stakes aren&#039;t high some organizations are okay with 95% chance to beat original too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rafael: it depends on how important results are for an organization and how much risk (of being wrong) it is willing to accept. 99% chance to beat original is always better, but if stakes aren&#8217;t high some organizations are okay with 95% chance to beat original too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael</title>
		<link>http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/what-you-really-need-to-know-about-mathematics-of-ab-split-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-4022</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/?p=60#comment-4022</guid>
		<description>How much overlap is allowed between the two distributions to be confident that version B is better?

You said that if there is 1% overlap between conversion rate distribution of control and variation, then there is 99% chance of variation beating the control.

What if there is a 5% overlap? In this case, is there a 95% chance of the variation beating the original?

What about a 6% overlap?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much overlap is allowed between the two distributions to be confident that version B is better?</p>
<p>You said that if there is 1% overlap between conversion rate distribution of control and variation, then there is 99% chance of variation beating the control.</p>
<p>What if there is a 5% overlap? In this case, is there a 95% chance of the variation beating the original?</p>
<p>What about a 6% overlap?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paras Chopra</title>
		<link>http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/what-you-really-need-to-know-about-mathematics-of-ab-split-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-4014</link>
		<dc:creator>Paras Chopra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/?p=60#comment-4014</guid>
		<description>@Andi: it is a binomial distribution and for binomial distribution, variance is p * (1 - p)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andi: it is a binomial distribution and for binomial distribution, variance is p * (1 &#8211; p)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andi</title>
		<link>http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/what-you-really-need-to-know-about-mathematics-of-ab-split-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-4013</link>
		<dc:creator>Andi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/?p=60#comment-4013</guid>
		<description>Can you explain how you get to this formula, please?
Standard Error (SE) = Square root of (p * (1-p) / n)

I don&#039;t understand how you can calculate the standard error without knowing anything about the variance.
That would be really helpful, thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you explain how you get to this formula, please?<br />
Standard Error (SE) = Square root of (p * (1-p) / n)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand how you can calculate the standard error without knowing anything about the variance.<br />
That would be really helpful, thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dossier metrics part4, pour aller plus loin: sources et ouvrages &#124; Clement vouillon</title>
		<link>http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/what-you-really-need-to-know-about-mathematics-of-ab-split-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-3707</link>
		<dc:creator>Dossier metrics part4, pour aller plus loin: sources et ouvrages &#124; Clement vouillon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/?p=60#comment-3707</guid>
		<description>[...] What you really need to know about mathematics of A/B split testing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What you really need to know about mathematics of A/B split testing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Introducing frequently used goals, test thresholds, custom currency and more!</title>
		<link>http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/what-you-really-need-to-know-about-mathematics-of-ab-split-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-3603</link>
		<dc:creator>Introducing frequently used goals, test thresholds, custom currency and more!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 22:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/?p=60#comment-3603</guid>
		<description>[...] by default, we declare winning variation if the (statistical) confidence is &gt;95% (here&#8217;s the math of A/B testing if you are interested). Now from settings, you can change it to any value you want. So if you want [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by default, we declare winning variation if the (statistical) confidence is &gt;95% (here&#8217;s the math of A/B testing if you are interested). Now from settings, you can change it to any value you want. So if you want [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paras Chopra</title>
		<link>http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/what-you-really-need-to-know-about-mathematics-of-ab-split-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-3454</link>
		<dc:creator>Paras Chopra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualwebsiteoptimizer.com/split-testing-blog/?p=60#comment-3454</guid>
		<description>@Anne: you make a good point and it will be great to capture trending into a mathematical number. However, &#039;chance to beat original&#039; or &#039;statistical significance&#039; talks about results in overall context. With these metrics we want to understand what is the likelihood that variation is performing better as compared to control given a specific sample (over a number of days). 

What you are asking is a number that says how consistent is the performance. Those are two different things but nevertheless consistency can be important too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anne: you make a good point and it will be great to capture trending into a mathematical number. However, &#8216;chance to beat original&#8217; or &#8217;statistical significance&#8217; talks about results in overall context. With these metrics we want to understand what is the likelihood that variation is performing better as compared to control given a specific sample (over a number of days). </p>
<p>What you are asking is a number that says how consistent is the performance. Those are two different things but nevertheless consistency can be important too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.068 seconds -->

